Claim settlement by banks where survivor/nominee clause does not exist

There are two possibilities in a bank account maintained by a customer viz. (i)  a deposit account is opened in a bank with a valid nomination or with the survivorship clause like ‘either or survivor’, or ‘anyone or survivor’, or ‘former or survivor’ or ‘latter or survivor’ etc.  (ii) A deposit account is opened in a bank without a valid nomination or without the survivorship clause like ‘either or survivor’, or ‘anyone or survivor’, or ‘former or survivor’ or ‘latter or survivor’ etc.

Banks in India are guided by RBI to set a framework for the settlement of claim amount where accounts are maintained by the bank without the survivor/nominee clauses. This is to avoid superfluous, undue hardship and inconvenience to the claimants. Accordingly, every bank in India has fixed a minimum threshold limit for the balance in the account of deceased depositors up to which claims of legal heirs can be settled without demanding any documents other than a letter of indemnity. As per RBI guidelines premature closure of the term deposit(s) is allowed in the event of the death of the depositor. Such premature closure of deposit would not attract any penal charges.

The deposit account proceeds may be settled to the claimants through a negotiable instrument (DD/Banker’s cheque) or   transfer the claim proceds in the name of appropriate beneficiary on scrutiny of the following.

  1. The death of the account holder is confirmed to the bank through appropriate documentary evidence (death certificate).
  2. Bank has verified properly the identity of the claimant(s) and made payments only after the suitable identification of the claim(s), to the bank’s satisfaction and the establishment of the identity of the legal heirs/legal representatives.
  3. The bank has not received an order from the competent court restraining the bank from such payments.
  4. Production of indemnity from the claimants for the claim settled by the bank
  5. In case the claim amount exceeds the threshold limit fixed by the bank’s Board, the bank may insist production of any other documents like succession certificate, letter of administration or probate, etc., or obtain any bond of indemnity from the claimant as per system and procedure adopted by the bank.In certain exceptional cases  banks may also obtain indemnity plus one surety good for the amount or two surities jointly good for the amount.
  6. When other legal heirs do not have objection in settling the claim amount to any one of them, banks take a letter of relinquishment (letter of authority/letter of disclaimer etc.) from the remaining legal heirs/representatives. In such cases there is no need to obtain affidavit cum indemnity from other legal heirs.

Related articles:

Claim settlement by banks where survivor/nominee clause exist

How banks settle claims of a missing person on presumed death

 

Surendra Naik

Share
Published by
Surendra Naik

Recent Posts

Govt. revises norms for Dividend payout, Bonus Shares, Stock split, and Share buybacks

The Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) released new guidelines amending its earlier2016…

2 hours ago

Bank Holidays 2025: National Capital Territory Delhi

The Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi has released the official list of…

23 hours ago

Bank Holidays 2025: State of Rajasthan

The Government of Rajasthan in their Order No.16 (1).v.m./2024 dated 19.11.2024 declared bank Holidays under…

1 day ago

Distinguishing Capital expenditure and Revenue expenditure

Meaning of Expenditure and Expenses: Expenditure refers to the total amount spent to acquire goods…

1 day ago

Bank Holidays 2025: Gujarat State

In pursuance of the explanation in section 25 of NI Act 1881, read with the…

2 days ago

Deepfake videos of RBI Governor: RBI warns public to be careful

 The Reserve Bank of India on Tuesday placed on its website that the deepfake videos…

3 days ago