(This post elucidates on recovery and monitoring process of NPA accounts,advantage and disadvantage of Compromise settlement, and gains of NPA recovery)
The asset of the bank, classified as NPA ceases to generate income to the bank. In addition to stoppage of income generation to the banks, banks are required to make provision for NPA. Therefore, NPA is a double edged razor; damaging the profit, weakening the capital structure and reducing the rating of the bank.
As long as loans and advances remain in bank books, the certain portion of loan accounts ought to remain as NPAs for various reasons. Though NPAs cannot be totally avoided, they can be reduced to the minimum level by continuously monitoring the account and adapting certain precautions at the time of new sanction, annual review/renewal/enhancements of limits. The rehabilitation of viable units, rephasing loan installments wherever necessary,applying for settlement of the claim from CGTMSE/ECGC, Compromise settlements like One Time Settlement (OTS),Out of Court Settlement (OCS), writing off non-recoverable assets are parts of the process involved in reducing NPAs.
Pre-sanction and post sanction credit monitoring has a major role in reducing NPAs. Qualitative appraisal of financial statements understanding the unhealthy developments in accounts and working of the company, examination of the viability of the project before providing financial assistance to a borrowing unit are the essential aspects in reducing NPAs. Projected expansion plan is to be compared with growth in industrial production of peers.Identifying the early symptom of sickness like effective Scrutiny of periodical statements, discussions with the borrower, analysis of borrower’s account with the bank, discussion with co-bankers, may be helpful in identifying the early symptom of the sickness of the unit. Stock-audit by external professionals like charted accountants, at least once a year for large borrower accounts is also essential. Recalling the advance is vital when it appears that borrower is diverting the bank finance to some other purpose or diluting the security offered.
Other tools available to banks for reducing NPAs:
Click the following to know the procedure of-Recovery through Lok Adalat, Recovery through D.R.T. and Recovery through SARFAESI Act 2002.
The advantage of Compromise settlement:
Disadvantages:
Gains of NPA recovery:
NPA recovery leads to multiple gains to the bank. Every Rupee recovered adds up cost-free resources to the bank. The recovered money can be recycled for further lending which enhances the current earning of the bank. The operating and net profit of the bank would improve. The capital structure of the bank would be strengthened. Recovery in NPA accounts improves the efficiency and profitability ratios of the bank and thereby improves Bank’s rating.
“Under the explanation to Section 25 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Central Act 26…
When the trial balance does not tally due to the one-sided errors in the books,…
Errors in Trial Balance are mistakes made during the accounting process that cannot always be…
“Under the explanation to Section 25 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Central Act 26…
The Reserve Bank of India is expanding reporting requirements for foreign exchange transactions. Starting February…
“Under the explanation to Section 25 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Central Act 26…