Non‑registration does not invalidate the partnership, but it imposes significant disabilities on enforcing contractual rights in courts; registration cures these disabilities by enabling the firm and partners to sue, claim set‑off, and be formally recognized on the Register of Firms. Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 is the central provision governing these effects and the procedural framework for registration.
Effect of non‑registration
- Bar on suits by partners against firm/partners: No suit to enforce a right arising from a contract or conferred by the Act can be instituted by or on behalf of any person suing as a partner against the firm or any person alleged to be a partner, unless the firm is registered and the plaintiff is shown on the Register as a partner.
- Bar on suits by firm against third parties: An unregistered firm cannot sue any third party to enforce a contractual right unless the firm is registered and the suing partners are shown in the Register.
- Bar extends to set‑off/other proceedings: The above bars also apply to a claim of set‑off or “other proceeding” to enforce a right arising from a contract; thus, even defensive monetary set‑offs above nominal thresholds are restricted.
- Exceptions preserved: The bars do not affect suits for dissolution of a firm, for accounts of a dissolved firm, for realization of property of a dissolved firm, or enforcement of rights not arising from contract (e.g., certain statutory/non‑contractual claims), subject to local amendments.
- Third‑party suits unaffected: Outsiders can still sue an unregistered firm; non‑registration is a disability only on the firm/partners seeking to enforce contractual rights, not a shield against liability.
Registration: process and legal effect
- Procedural outline: Registration is effected by filing a statement with the Registrar of Firms containing firm name, principal place of business, partners’ names/addresses, date of joining, and duration, signed and verified as prescribed; upon scrutiny, the Registrar records an entry and issues a certificate.
- Legal consequences of registration: Enables the firm and partners to institute suits to enforce contractual rights, to claim set‑off/counter‑claim, and to be formally recognized for public notice purposes; subsequent changes (admissions, retirements) must be recorded to keep the Register current.
- Timing and curative effect: Subsequent registration before filing the suit removes the bar; however, a suit instituted while unregistered is not maintainable and cannot ordinarily be cured by post‑filing registration.
- State amendments: Certain states have additional restrictions or procedural variations (e.g., past Maharashtra Section 69(2‑A) experience), so deeds and litigation strategy should account for local amendments.
Banking and contracting implications
- Enforceability risk: Lenders and counterparties prefer dealing with registered firms to avoid suit/set‑off disabilities and to ensure partner identities/authority are on public record.
- Diligence checklist: Obtain registration certificate and current extract of the Register, verify partners listed match deed/mandate, and ensure filings for admissions/retirements are up to date before executing facilities or major contracts.
- Litigation posture: If dealing with an unregistered firm, anticipate that the firm may be barred from suing to enforce contract claims, but ensure own compliance to avoid procedural defenses; consider securing arbitration clauses and novations post‑registration.
Practical pointers for registration
- File promptly after constitution and on every change; align deed details with Registrar filings to avoid discrepancies.
- Maintain proofs: acknowledgment of filing, Registrar’s entry, certificate, and updated partner list; use these in bank KYC and public notices.
- Track local nuances: Confirm any state‑specific requirements or bars that may impact ability to sue for dissolution/accounts or realization of property.
Related Posts:
