Hybrid work is moving from experiment to operating system, blending the strengths of physical presence with the scalability of virtual collaboration to unlock productivity, inclusion, and agility. At the same time, novel models like U‑Work and Open2U are redefining employment and engagement, while India’s labour law framework gradually adapts to platform, gig, and remote-first realities.
Hybrid model: unified work
A hybrid model intentionally distributes work across office and remote settings, aligning place with purpose: co-location for creativity and culture, remote for focus and flexibility, and hubs for access and inclusion. To make hybrid work stick, organizations codify work-from-home policies, update HR and IT rules, invest in secure infrastructure, and train managers and teams for seamless collaboration and data protection end-to-end. India-specific guidance emphasizes defining “workplace,” specifying office-day cadence, expanding applicability of internal policies to remote locations, and supporting employees with allowances and tools.
U‑Work and Open2U
U‑Work offers a flexible association with a monthly retainer plus benefits, while employees take project-based assignments and can pursue other interests between gigs, retaining security and connection to the firm. Open2U brings structure to gig engagements: project-based work with assignment bonuses and selected benefits, designed to give freelancers flexibility with a safety net and access to learning. Together, these models blur boundaries between full-time and freelance by mixing flexibility with security, enabling talent fluidity without losing culture and quality.
Legal framework in India
India currently lacks a single, dedicated statute for hybrid/remote work, making robust internal WFH policies, contractual clarity, and compliance-by-design essential for employers. The Code on Social Security, 2020, for the first time defines “gig workers” and “platform workers,” enabling government schemes and imposing aggregator contributions, with emerging state actions shaping practice. Commentary through 2024–2025 stresses that while Labour Codes consolidate many laws, remote/hybrid work still relies on policies addressing workplace definition, working hours, OSH responsibilities, data security, tax/ESI/EPF situs, and POSH coverage for virtual workplaces.
What employers should codify
- Define workplace to include remote location(s); specify reporting office and hybrid cadence; document attendance and availability norms.
- Extend POSH, discipline, and IT/security policies to remote contexts; implement DLP, MFA, and secure device/BYOD standards.
- Clarify OSH duties, ergonomic support, allowances, and incident reporting for offsite work; align with Shops & Establishments as applicable.
Culture as the glue
Hybrid excellence is primarily cultural: psychological safety, outcome-based management, asynchronous-first norms, and equitable meeting design ensure all voices are heard regardless of location. Rituals that reconnect people to purpose—demo days, in-person sprints, virtual townhalls, and peer recognition—sustain belonging and momentum. Leaders need to role-model flexibility with accountability, narrate strategy repeatedly, and measure inclusion and collaboration, not just activity.
Creativity in hybrid
Creativity thrives when organizations protect deep work blocks, use office time for divergence/convergence, and leverage digital whiteboards with inclusive facilitation. Rotating “maker days,” cross-functional hack weeks, and “idea markets” keep innovation flowing across locations while reducing meeting fatigue. Upskilling for hybrid brainstorming, storytelling, and rapid prototyping makes ideation habitual rather than episodic.
Designing hybrid: practical blueprint
- Work taxonomy: map tasks to best mode—co-create in-office, focus remotely, connect via hybrid rituals—then publish the operating cadence.
- Policy stack: WFH/Hybrid Code, Flex Hours, BYOD/IT Security, POSH virtual coverage, Travel/Allowance, and moonlighting disclosure and conflicts.
- Infrastructure: stipends for ergonomic setups, secure collaboration suite, analytics for space planning, and work-from-anywhere guardrails for tax/permanent establishment risks.
Guardrails for U‑Work/Open2U‑like models
- Contracts should specify retainer, assignment terms, benefits eligibility, confidentiality/IP, non-solicitation, and conflicts of interest.
- Ensure social security compliance for eligible categories; for gig/platform contributors, track aggregator obligations and state welfare registrations.
- Transparent selection, fair pay benchmarking, and equal access to learning reduce inequity between core and flexible talent pools.
Compliance signals to watch
- Operationalization timelines and rules under the Labour Codes impacting working time, leave, OSH, and social security across hybrid contexts.
- State-level gig-worker welfare acts, contribution mechanisms, and reporting templates for platforms/aggregators.
- Evolving regulator and industry guidance on remote OSH norms, cyber security expectations, and cross-border remote work taxation.
Executive takeaways
- The hybrid model is now a durable default; success depends on clear policies, secure tech, and culture-by-design that balances autonomy with outcomes.
- Novel models like U‑Work and Open2U show how to scale flexibility without undermining security, benefits, or brand standards.
- India’s legal regime is converging on recognition for non-traditional work, especially gig/platform workers, but hybrid/remote governance still hinges on employer policy strength and compliance rigor.
HRM Articles related to Model ‘E’ of CAIIB –Elective paper:
