Industrial Relations (Part B): Unions, Discipline, Participation, and Modern IR

Industrial relations (IR) integrates the institutions, processes, and practices that shape employer–employee interactions—covering trade unions, collective bargaining, discipline and grievance systems, conflict management, and participative mechanisms in governance.

Historical background of trade union movement

The Indian trade union movement traces its roots to late-19th-century industrialization in textile, jute, and railways, with early formations like the Bombay Mill-Hands Association (1890) and Madras Labour Union (1918). The period 1918–1924 saw rapid unionization influenced by World War I hardships, the ILO’s founding (1919), and nationalist mobilization, culminating in AITUC’s formation in 1920. Subsequent phases involved ideological pluralism (INTUC, HMS, BMS, CITU), legal recognition via the Trade Unions Act, 1926, and post-independence consolidation aligned to political parties.

  • Early unions were welfare-oriented and reformist, evolving toward rights-based collective bargaining.
  • The six-phase narrative commonly spans pre-1918 origins through post-1991 liberalization and contemporary fragmentation.
  • Institutionalization brought registration norms, political linkages, and sectoral diversification beyond mills into services.

Trade unions in banks

Banking unions emerged alongside nationalized banking expansion and public-sector consolidation, with federations representing officers and workmen. Core agendas include wage settlements (bipartite), job security, transfers, performance-linked pay, digitization impacts, and workload rationalization. Private and foreign banks exhibit lower union density, while PSBs maintain robust structures interfacing with industry-level negotiations.

  • Bipartite settlements set industry standards for pay and service conditions in PSBs.
  • Union roles extend to training, health and safety, and policy feedback on technology and compliance pressures.
  • Emerging themes include reskilling, sales-pressure governance, and psychosocial risk management.

Industrial relations

IR frameworks balance efficiency, equity, and voice through rules (laws, codes), actors (management, unions, state), and processes (bargaining, consultation, dispute resolution). Contemporary IR blends statutory codification with enterprise flexibility, emphasizing prevention, dialogue, and data-driven compliance.

  • Preventive IR relies on clear standing orders, consistent supervision, and early issue detection.
  • Institutions—conciliation, tribunals, and internal committees—anchor fair process and remedies.
  • Technology (HRIS, case management) improves traceability and timeliness in IR handling.

Collective bargaining

Collective bargaining is the structured negotiation between employer and employee representatives to determine wages, hours, and other terms. Effective bargaining requires recognition protocols, information sharing, mandate clarity, and solution-focused packages.

  • Levels: industry-level (e.g., banking bipartite), enterprise-level, and departmental.
  • Approaches: distributive (claim-based), integrative (interest-based), and productivity-linked frameworks.
  • Outcomes should be measurable, time-bound, and supported by joint monitoring committees.

Employee discipline and grievance

Discipline sustains standards of conduct and performance through fair rules and proportionate consequences, while grievance systems address perceived injustices.

  • Discipline principles: legality, consistency, natural justice, and progressive steps.
  • Typical disciplinary flow: notice of charges, explanation, domestic inquiry, findings, proportional penalty, and appeal.
  • Grievance systems resolve dissatisfaction early, preserving trust and productivity.

‘Grievance’: concept and definition

A grievance is any real or perceived feeling of injustice related to work conditions, policies, or interpersonal treatment that an employee brings to management for redress. It spans individual or group concerns about rights (rule/policy), interests (conditions), or relationships (treatment/dignity).

  • Key attributes: specific issue, expressed or documented, expectation of remedy.
  • Sources: contractual/rights-based, policy/procedure deviations, supervisory behavior, or environment.

Causes and effects of grievance

Common causes include role ambiguity, workload/sales pressure, unfair evaluations, pay disparities, unsafe or stressful environments, policy inconsistency, and disrespect. Effects range from reduced morale and productivity to absenteeism, conflict escalation, and turnover; if ignored, issues can spread, triggering industrial action.

  • Early, empathetic handling reduces cost and preserves culture.
  • Data patterning (repeat issues by team/process) signals systemic fixes.

Grievance redressal mechanism

A robust mechanism is timely, impartial, and transparent, with clear steps and documentation.

  • Intake and logging: multi-channel access (supervisor, HR, portal), anonymized option where lawful.
  • Acknowledgment and triage: classify by severity; set SLA for resolution.
  • Fact-finding: interviews, records review, and objective assessment.
  • Decision and remedy: communicate reasons, implement corrective action, and offer appeal.
  • Closure and learning: capture root cause and feed process improvements.

Best practices include defined timelines, trained Chairs/Members, non-retaliation guarantees, and periodic dashboards to the management council.

Conflict management

Conflict is natural in complex workplaces; the aim is constructive resolution that protects relationships and outcomes.

  • Modes: collaborate, compromise, accommodate, avoid, or compete—chosen per stakes/time/relationships.
  • Tools: interest-based problem solving, mediation, facilitated dialogues, and data-backed options.
  • Preventive levers: role clarity, fair workloads, manager training, and participative forums.

Management dilemma

Leaders often face trade-offs between flexibility and fairness, speed and due process, cost and capability, or confidentiality and transparency. Sound IR navigates these dilemmas by anchoring decisions in policy, evidence, and values while communicating rationale and alternatives.

  • Establish escalation matrices and decision rights to avoid ad hocism.
  • Use impact assessments for IR-sensitive changes (e.g., restructuring, targets, tech shifts).

Workers’ participation in management (WPM)

WPM institutionalizes employee voice in decisions affecting work, improving commitment, quality, and innovation.

‘Participation’: concept and definition

Participation is the deliberate inclusion of workers in information-sharing, consultation, joint decision-making, or co-determination on matters influencing their work and workplace.

  • It ranges from suggestion-level input to formal shared governance on specified domains.
  • Effective participation enhances trust, reduces conflict, and supports continuous improvement.

Types and methods of participation

Types span information-sharing, consultative participation, joint decision-making, and representative participation.

Methods include:

  • Joint management councils/works committees: periodic agenda-driven consultations on productivity, welfare, and safety.
  • Standing committees: safety, canteen, grievance, POSH, diversity and inclusion.
  • Quality circles and kaizen boards: small-group problem-solving with measurable targets.
  • Suggestion schemes and digital idea platforms: structured intake, evaluation, and rewards.
  • Shop-floor huddles and town halls: real-time feedback and two-way communication.
  • Co-design of SOPs and schedules: frontline involvement in process and shift design.
  • Productivity-linked gainsharing: formula-based sharing connected to jointly tracked metrics.

Implementation tips:

  • Define scope and decision rights; train representatives and managers.
  • Ensure data transparency, minutes, and follow-through on actions.
  • Link participation outcomes to recognition and career pathways.

Practical IR toolkit for organizations

  • Codify: clear standing orders/handbooks, role expectations, and fair-pay architecture.
  • Detect: pulse surveys, ethics lines, and grievance dashboards to spot hotspots early.
  • Dialogize: regular union/employee forums with data rooms for negotiations.
  • Develop: manager capability in labor law, investigations, and mediation.
  • Digitize: case management and workflow SLAs for traceability and audit.
  • De-risk: IR impact assessments for policy and tech changes; reskilling pathways for transitions.

HRM Articles related to Model (C & D) of CAIIB –Elective paper:

MOTIVATION, TRAINING, AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT IN HRM: BUILDING A FUTURE-READY WORKFORCEPERSONNEL MANAGEMENT IN HRM: FUNCTIONS, LEGAL FOUNDATIONS, AND WORKING CONDITIONSINDUSTRIAL RELATIONS IN HRM: CODES, COMPLIANCE, AND A CHANGING LANDSCAPE
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS (PART B): UNIONS, DISCIPLINE, PARTICIPATION, AND MODERN IRHRM IN INDIAN BANKING: WORKERS’ PARTICIPATION IN MANAGEMENT (WPM) – EVOLUTION, PRACTICES, AND CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGESHRM: DISCIPLINE AT WORKPLACE  
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Telegram
Comments