In the realm of personal financial planning, nomination is a widely recognized mechanism governed under various statutory frameworks including the Life Insurance Act, the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, the Payment of Gratuity Act, the Co-operative Societies Act, and the Banking Regulation Act. Individuals often assume that by merely executing nominations for their bank deposits, cooperative society assets, insurance policies, mutual funds, shares, and lockers, they have ensured the seamless transmission of their assets upon demise. However, this assumption warrants closer legal scrutiny.
Legal Status of a Nominee
While a nomination may facilitate provisional handling of assets by financial institutions, it does not, by itself, confer ownership or absolute rights upon the nominee. In legal terms, a nominee functions merely as a trustee or custodian of the asset until the rightful claimants—determined by applicable succession laws—are identified. Nomination does not override the law of succession.
To illustrate, consider a situation where a husband nominates his wife in respect of all his financial and real estate assets, with the intention of excluding his children from inheritance during her lifetime. Despite the nomination, the wife, in her capacity as a nominee, holds the assets in trust and cannot claim exclusive ownership if other legal heirs survive the deceased.
This principle was clearly enunciated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Smt. Sarbati Devi v. Smt. Usha Devi [AIR 1984 SC 346], wherein it was held that a nominee under the Insurance Act does not acquire beneficial ownership, and the proceeds are subject to succession laws. Consequently, when disputes arise among legal heirs, courts may issue stay orders on the distribution of assets, leading financial institutions to withhold disbursal to the nominee until judicial clarity is obtained. The same legal principle applies to the operation of bank lockers, transfer of cooperative housing society flats, or commercial properties.
Why a Will is Essential
In the absence of a valid Will, the estate of the deceased is distributed in accordance with intestate succession laws applicable to the individual’s religion and personal laws. This may lead to unintended distribution, legal disputes, or delays in asset transfer.
A properly executed Will, on the other hand, supersedes intestate succession. It allows the testator to legally designate specific beneficiaries, ensuring that their intentions regarding the disposition of assets are honored. The Will carries legal enforceability, thereby minimizing the risk of litigation and ensuring efficient estate administration.
Conclusion
Nomination is a limited procedural convenience and not a substitute for testamentary planning. To avoid ambiguity, family disputes, and legal entanglements, individuals are strongly advised to execute a Will in addition to making nominations. A Will offers legal certainty and aligns the distribution of the estate with the deceased’s intentions.
Disclaimer: This article is intended solely for informational and educational purposes. Readers are advised to consult qualified legal or financial advisors before making any decisions based on the content herein. The author disclaims any liability for actions taken by readers relying on the information provided.
Related Posts:
