Global banking regulation evolved to safeguard financial stability across borders, harmonize prudential norms, and prevent regulatory arbitrage. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) has led this evolution through milestones like the 1975 Concordat, the 1988 Basel I Accord, the 1996 Market Risk Amendment, and the 2004 Basel II framework. Basel Committee overview The BCBS…
Banks are the backbone of any modern economy, acting as custodians of public savings and providers of credit that fuel growth. However, given their central role, banks are also exposed to risks that, if left unchecked, can destabilize the financial system. This is why regulation and supervision are not just necessary but critical in maintaining…
India’s banking sector is integrating climate risk into core risk governance, aligning with Basel principles and emerging RBI frameworks on disclosures and green finance to safeguard stability and accelerate sustainable development. Climate in India India faces high exposure to physical climate risks—extreme heat, floods, cyclones, and erratic monsoons—with systemic implications for credit, liquidity, and operational…
Corporate governance has emerged as a cornerstone of sustainable growth and trust in the banking sector. Sound governance ensures that banks safeguard depositor interests, maintain strong internal controls, and balance profitability with systemic stability. With the growing complexity of financial systems, regulators worldwide have laid increasing emphasis on governance frameworks to protect the integrity of…
The financial services sector today faces a rapidly evolving landscape of risks, largely driven by digitization, proliferation of electronic delivery channels, and rising sophistication of cyber threats. Banks and financial institutions must embed robust information security practices, adopt advanced technology safeguards, and frame resilient business continuity measures to protect customers, stakeholders, and the wider financial…
Organizations can materially reduce technology risk by enforcing disciplined lifecycle controls across change, access, monitoring, and vendor ecosystems, aligned to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and NIST guidance. Patch management Change management Audit trails Security reporting and metrics Vendors and critical service providers Network security Remote access DDoS/DoS mitigation Implementing ISO/IEC 27001 Operational Risk Articles related to Model…
Operational risk teams rely on two cornerstone tools to keep processes safe and compliant: Risk and Control Self-Assessment (RCSA) and Key Risk Indicators (KRIs). Together, they identify where things can go wrong, evaluate whether controls are working, and track early warning signals against clear risk appetite thresholds. The result is sharper visibility, faster escalation, and…
Introduction Operational risk loss data forms the foundation of a strong risk management framework. When collected and analyzed effectively, it transforms isolated incidents into enterprise-wide insights—supporting governance, capital planning, and stronger internal controls. By combining internal incident histories with external industry data, organizations can better address rare but severe risks, benchmark performance, and refine scenario…
Operational risk has become a central concern for financial institutions worldwide. Unlike credit or market risk, it is not confined to a specific category of transactions but permeates all organizational functions. Driven by emerging technologies, growing complexity in financial systems, and stricter regulatory expectations, operational risk demands a structured and strategic approach. Developments Giving Rise…
Overview and intentValue at Risk (VaR) estimates the maximum expected loss over a specified horizon at a chosen confidence level, giving a single, comparable summary of market risk across portfolios and desks. It answers: over horizon T, with confidence level p, what is the worst loss not exceeded under normal conditions. It is widely used…