Building a Robust ICAAP Stress Testing Program: Objectives, Methods, and the PCA Link
Stress testing within ICAAP is a forward‑looking, governance‑anchored discipline that evaluates a bank’s resilience under adverse yet plausible conditions and informs capital planning, risk appetite, and early corrective actions aligned with supervisory expectations under Pillar 2 and the PCA framework. Role and objective Stress testing in ICAAP assesses whether internal capital and liquidity are adequate…
Read article Supervisory Review Process and ICAAP under Basel’s Pillar 2
The Supervisory Review Process (SREP) and the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) together ensure that banks maintain capital commensurate with their risk profile and operate above minimums using forward‑looking, proportionate, and well‑governed processes, with supervisors empowered to review, challenge, and intervene early where needed. Objective of Pillar 2 Pillar 2 aims to ensure banks…
Read article
Capital Charge for Operational Risk: From Legacy Approaches to the New Standardized Paradigm
Operational risk capital ensures that banks can absorb losses arising from process failures, people, systems, or external events, with Basel’s current framework centering on a standardized, data-driven approach anchored in business indicators and internal loss experience. This article outlines definitions, methodologies, legacy approaches (BIA/SA/AMA), key shortcomings, and the new standardized approach with business indicators, risk-weighted…
Read article Regulatory Capital and Capital Adequacy: From Accounting Residuals to Basel III Risk Standards
Regulatory capital ensures banks can absorb losses while continuing to serve the economy, evolving from simple balance‑sheet residuals to risk‑sensitive frameworks under Basel III that cover credit, counterparty, market, and off‑balance sheet risks comprehensively. Capital adequacy today blends risk‑weighted requirements with leverage and liquidity backstops, using standardized and internal model approaches bounded by output floors…
Read article Global Financial Crisis and Basel III: How Regulation Evolved
The Global Financial Crisis (GFC) exposed critical gaps in bank capital, liquidity, risk management, and oversight; Basel III was the international regulatory response to harden bank balance sheets, curb procyclicality, and improve resilience through higher-quality capital, liquidity standards, and systemic safeguards. The reforms reframed prudential policy around loss absorbency, credible buffers, and robust supervision to…
Global Banking Regulation: From the Concordat to Basel II
Global banking regulation evolved to safeguard financial stability across borders, harmonize prudential norms, and prevent regulatory arbitrage. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) has led this evolution through milestones like the 1975 Concordat, the 1988 Basel I Accord, the 1996 Market Risk Amendment, and the 2004 Basel II framework. Basel Committee overview The BCBS…
Read article