The Global Financial Crisis (GFC) exposed critical gaps in bank capital, liquidity, risk management, and oversight; Basel III was the international regulatory response to harden bank balance sheets, curb procyclicality, and improve resilience through higher-quality capital, liquidity standards, and systemic safeguards. The reforms reframed prudential policy around loss absorbency, credible buffers, and robust supervision to…
Global banking regulation evolved to safeguard financial stability across borders, harmonize prudential norms, and prevent regulatory arbitrage. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) has led this evolution through milestones like the 1975 Concordat, the 1988 Basel I Accord, the 1996 Market Risk Amendment, and the 2004 Basel II framework. Basel Committee overview The BCBS…
Banks are the backbone of any modern economy, acting as custodians of public savings and providers of credit that fuel growth. However, given their central role, banks are also exposed to risks that, if left unchecked, can destabilize the financial system. This is why regulation and supervision are not just necessary but critical in maintaining…
India’s banking sector is integrating climate risk into core risk governance, aligning with Basel principles and emerging RBI frameworks on disclosures and green finance to safeguard stability and accelerate sustainable development. Climate in India India faces high exposure to physical climate risks—extreme heat, floods, cyclones, and erratic monsoons—with systemic implications for credit, liquidity, and operational…
Corporate governance has emerged as a cornerstone of sustainable growth and trust in the banking sector. Sound governance ensures that banks safeguard depositor interests, maintain strong internal controls, and balance profitability with systemic stability. With the growing complexity of financial systems, regulators worldwide have laid increasing emphasis on governance frameworks to protect the integrity of…
The financial services sector today faces a rapidly evolving landscape of risks, largely driven by digitization, proliferation of electronic delivery channels, and rising sophistication of cyber threats. Banks and financial institutions must embed robust information security practices, adopt advanced technology safeguards, and frame resilient business continuity measures to protect customers, stakeholders, and the wider financial…
Organizations can materially reduce technology risk by enforcing disciplined lifecycle controls across change, access, monitoring, and vendor ecosystems, aligned to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and NIST guidance. Patch management Change management Audit trails Security reporting and metrics Vendors and critical service providers Network security Remote access DDoS/DoS mitigation Implementing ISO/IEC 27001 Operational Risk Articles related to Model…
In today’s digital-first world, technology risk has become a critical concern for every organization. The growing dependence on information systems, connectivity, and data-driven decision-making brings immense opportunities—but also exposes enterprises to cyber threats, data breaches, and systemic vulnerabilities. Information security (InfoSec) forms the backbone of managing technology risk and ensuring resilience against the ever-changing threat…
Operational risk teams rely on two cornerstone tools to keep processes safe and compliant: Risk and Control Self-Assessment (RCSA) and Key Risk Indicators (KRIs). Together, they identify where things can go wrong, evaluate whether controls are working, and track early warning signals against clear risk appetite thresholds. The result is sharper visibility, faster escalation, and…
Introduction Operational risk loss data forms the foundation of a strong risk management framework. When collected and analyzed effectively, it transforms isolated incidents into enterprise-wide insights—supporting governance, capital planning, and stronger internal controls. By combining internal incident histories with external industry data, organizations can better address rare but severe risks, benchmark performance, and refine scenario…
